Works by Bill Wood
Curated by Lucia Arbery Simek & Gavin Morrison
June 3 - July 30, 2022
Dale Brock and Visiting Angels Gallery
![](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/93b048_63d6d2ee14a14a00b7c6b358cc9e5b17~mv2.jpeg/v1/fill/w_980,h_796,al_c,q_85,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01,enc_auto/93b048_63d6d2ee14a14a00b7c6b358cc9e5b17~mv2.jpeg)
Bill Wood (1912-1973) operated as a commercial photographer in Fort Worth from 1937 to 1970. From a studio at 1209 Throckmorton Street, he would take portraits and produce product images, but a greater part of his business was derived from commissions to photograph the city: new tract housing being built, store openings, and infrastructure developments, such as the construction of telephone exchanges for Southwestern Bell. This exhibition is composed solely of Bill Wood’s photographs of buildings, urban scenes, and construction in Fort Worth, which were taken in the 1950s and 60s as the city was undergoing a considerable boom in population and construction.
Bill Wood: Sprawl provides a means to reflect upon the growth of the city, as the photographs document a time when Fort Worth was spreading into previously undeveloped areas. These images can be contrasted with the current construction within the city, in which many of the same places seen in Wood’s photographs are being redeveloped and repurposed.
The exhibition is not only historical in focus but also provides an opportunity to consider photographic objectivity and inclusion. Wood’s photographs are not reportage; they were not taken to document the city but rather as part of a commercial enterprise. The style is consistent in its deadpan approach. In this regard Bill Wood’s photographs can be seen as an accidental precursor to the New Topographics photographic movement from the 1970s. The term was applied to a group of American photographers, such as Lewis Baltz (1945-2010) and Joe Deal (1947-2010), who used a similar objective approach to document suburban development and its relationship to the natural landscape.
Wood’s work can also be considered in relation to another art historical context, that of Walker Evans’ photographs of the dilapidated buildings of dust bowl era America for the Farm Security Administration. Wood shares with these a similar objective style but documents the urban development which followed that period of history. Where Evans’ photographs show a landscape in decline, Wood’s documents the optimism of the post-war boom and the city’s encroachment into previously untouched land.
Artist Biography
Bill Wood (1912-1973) lived for all his life in Fort Worth, Texas. He established Bill Wood Photo Co. in 1937, providing photographic equipment and services to the local business and the communities of Fort Worth. During World War II, he studied naval aviation and gunnery photography, and became a photographer's mate third class and an instructor at the Naval Auxiliary Air Station in Jacksonville, Florida. Bill Wood was diagnosed with cancer in 1970 and sold the business that year. The Bill Wood Photo Co. closed two years later. Bill Wood died in 1973.
In 2008, approximately 20,000 large-format negatives from the 1950s and 1960s were donated to the International Center of Photography (ICP) in New York by actress and photography collector Diane Keaton. That same year the ICP organised a survey exhibition and publication titled Bill Wood’s Business.
Bill Wood's analysis of sprawl is spot-on! The impact of urban ico-forums on city development cannot be overlooked. It's crucial to address sustainable planning to curb further sprawl and promote smart growth. Great read, thought-provoking insights!
To curators
I’m trying to be helpful here. I don’t understand:
why these were hung so badly: some way too high, some too low; I’m guessing there are not many visitors 7 ft tall?
why there was little to no context relative to original locations of photo subjects
why hung facing a gigantic open window, ie where there is THE MOST light in the building, and with reflective glass in the frames?!
The photos in the book, which are amazing, were not used; the ones featured are arguably the worst, least interesting of his entire oeuvre
This was very disappointing all around. you need to rethink your curatorial skills.